Lower metal prices, weaker operations, higher costs, delays and financing pressure.
Starting weight: 25%Our research framework
Follow the owners.
Underwrite the business.
Ownership brings a gold or silver company to our attention. Cash flow, valuation and portfolio risk determine whether it deserves more of it.
Version 1.0 November 8, 2026
The research funnel starts here
Ownership is a lead. Evidence comes next.
We track strategic shareholders, significant individual investors and management, with particular attention to smaller, overlooked gold and silver companies. Independent investors converging, meaningful stakes, new 10% positions and sustained accumulation are priorities for review. Insider purchases add context.
Who owns the shares, the size and basis of the stake, when it was reported, what actually changed and the original source. A percentage can rise after a buyback or fall after dilution without its owner trading a share.
How we interpret convergence
Strategic operators, active investment funds, passive managers and insiders are different types of owners. Vehicles under common control are not independent votes of confidence. A royalty, stream or project partnership is not automatically an equity stake in the listed company.
A 10% crossing triggers investigation; it does not establish future outperformance. Historical findings need dated samples, an appropriate benchmark and independent validation. A current holder count is not a validated return forecast.
Read the ownership-data methodology →Cash flow
A credible path to cash in hand.
Our core research focuses on operating producers and funded projects with a credible path to positive free cash flow within 18 months. First gold is a milestone; cash left after the bills and required investment is the test.
Operating proof
Grade, recovery, throughput and costs supported by actual results or a credible ramp-up plan.
Funding to completion
Remaining capital, contingency and liquidity covered, with financing terms and dilution understood.
Permission to operate
Essential permits, infrastructure and a realistic schedule, including the steps still outstanding.
Cash generation can reduce reliance on external financing. It does not eliminate geological, operating, balance-sheet or political risk. An unresolved funding gap or a long-dated development story stays outside this core screen.
Valuation
GoldSignal Risk-Adjusted NAV
We estimate the present value of the cash a mining business can generate, then account for financing and the claims ahead of common shareholders. The result is a range of values per share, with the assumptions visible.
A published NPV5 is one calculation at a 5% discount rate. Its usefulness depends on its price deck, costs, timing and whether it uses real or nominal cash flows. Our house framework tests those assumptions and the price an investor pays today.
Evidence-backed production, realistic ramp-up, normalized prices and required investment.
Starting weight: 50%Better execution or a justified expansion, with speculative exploration value kept separate.
Starting weight: 25%Weights are analyst assumptions, not measured probabilities. Each company can require different weights, which must be explained. Valuation status remains “under review” until a dated company model is complete.
Inside the cash-flow calculation
Project free cash flow = payable metal revenue − operating costs − royalties − cash taxes − sustaining and growth capital − working-capital investment − closure costs
We model each mine through its supported life, including remaining construction, ramp-up and reclamation. Streams and offtake terms affect the cash the owner actually receives. AISC alone is not a complete cash-flow model.
Base value relies on a supported mine plan. Resource conversion, exploration and extensions require separate assumptions. A depleting mine receives no automatic perpetual-growth terminal value.
Scenarios connect causes and consequences: a delay can add overhead and capex, postpone sales and require new financing. Higher gold prices can also mean higher royalties or taxes. We keep those relationships in the model.
Discount rates, inflation and timing
Our starting basis is nominal, after-tax USD project cash flow before financing, discounted at a consistent nominal USD asset rate. These are initial house assumptions, not validated company-specific costs of capital.
| Asset stage | Nominal USD rate |
|---|---|
| Established, cash-generating producer | 10% |
| Funded near-term mine or material ramp-up | 12% |
| Sensitivity range | 8%, 10%, 12%, 15% |
Asset-specific rates must be justified against financing conditions, currency and residual risk; evidence can require a higher rate. We review the starting rates periodically. An equity return target is not interchangeable with an asset discount rate.
Real cash flows require real rates; nominal cash flows require nominal rates. The conversion is (1 + nominal rate) = (1 + real rate) × (1 + inflation). Comparisons with company studies reconcile these bases first.
Delays, overruns and identified fiscal changes belong in scenario cash flows. The discount rate captures time value and remaining priced risk. We avoid adding another blanket penalty for the same risk already modeled.
From mine value to value per share
- Discount each mine's cash flows and apply the company's attributable economic ownership.
- Add excess cash and supported non-operating asset values; subtract debt, senior claims and the present value of corporate overhead.
- Model financing within each scenario: its timing, net proceeds, fees, new debt and resulting share count must reconcile.
- Calculate value per diluted share for each scenario, then apply the disclosed scenario weights.
New equity proceeds and new shares must appear together. Options and warrants need consistent treatment of shares and exercise proceeds. A funding gap changes the financing and dilution assumptions; it is not a second deduction of construction costs already included in cash flows.
We do not subtract interest from unlevered project cash flows and also deduct the same debt burden twice. Closure and streaming obligations are similarly reconciled to avoid double counting. Distress requires scenario-specific treatment of creditors and common equity.
What a completed valuation must show
- Valuation and share-price dates, currency, metal prices, inflation, tax and exchange-rate assumptions.
- Downside, base, upside and weighted NAV per share, with discount-rate and metal-price sensitivities.
- Capital requirements, debt, cash, corporate costs and scenario-specific dilution.
- Price relative to NAV, the required margin of safety and the facts that would invalidate the thesis.
A valuation discount is a reason to investigate, not an automatic buy signal. The necessary margin of safety depends on uncertainty, balance-sheet resilience and downside exposure. Neither a low multiple nor a large modeled upside overrides a failed cash-flow or risk filter.
Portfolio risk
A mine cannot relocate.
We favor durable property rights, predictable fiscal terms and workable local conditions. We assess where each mine operates, including state or province and community conditions. The location of a company's head office is not its risk profile.
Property rights
Mining title, contract enforcement, courts and government disputes.
Fiscal stability
Royalties, taxes, state participation and retrospective rule changes.
Operating continuity
Security, transport, power, water and access to the mine.
Local permission
Permits, land rights, community relationships and environmental obligations.
Access to cash
Export rules, currency convertibility and the ability to repatriate earnings.
Direction of travel
New laws, elections, fiscal pressure and treatment of other mine operators.
Strong protections and no material unresolved mine-level issue.
Identifiable risks, explicit downside assumptions and limits on exposure.
Material uncertainty must be resolved before a company can pass this filter.
Ownership, security, legal or cash-transfer risks exceed our tolerance.
Only Preferred and Acceptable with conditions pass this filter. Each assessment requires dated evidence and a review date. Country-level indicators inform the review; they do not replace mine-level judgment.
When we pass, even at an apparently cheap price
Credible unresolved expropriation threats, materially disputed essential title or permits, sustained inability to operate or repatriate cash, and unbounded security exposure can exclude a company. A high discount rate cannot turn an unacceptable risk into an acceptable investment.
Portfolio fit also considers single-mine dependence, operator execution, leverage, liquidity and shared jurisdiction exposure. We examine the share of value and cash flow at risk; an average country score must not conceal the mine that supplies most of a company's value.
We believe a more fragmented monetary system and a larger monetary role for gold could increase governments' incentives to tax or control domestic production. We treat this as a risk scenario, not a certainty, and test investments against tougher fiscal terms.
Principles behind the framework
GoldSignal Risk-Adjusted NAV is our house application of established valuation methods. These sources support the principles; our rates, scenario weights and screening judgments remain our own.
- CIM best-practice guidelines — discount-rate selection and balanced sensitivity analysis, sections 7.14.3.8–7.15.
- CIMVAL mineral-property valuation standards — recognized mineral-valuation principles.
- IAS 36, paragraphs 55–56 — the principle of avoiding risk double counting. Our model is not an accounting impairment calculation.
- MIGA investment guarantee guide — categories of political risk.
- World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators — governance context and the limits of country-level indicators.